Speed Trap: What a Police Officer Uses to Catch You

Know How They Catch You Speeding

by Kevin Ransom | AOL Autos

Posted: Apr, 08 2009

With HP wireless printers, you could have printed this from any room in the house. Live wirelessly. Print wirelessly.

Text Size A A A

Of course no one likes getting a speeding ticket, and who hasn't cried out, "You gotta be kidding me!" upon learning that a heavy foot just lightened your wallet by $150 or $200? But the sad truth is, the best way to avoid that kind of a bite is to just slow down, because police officers -- whether they be city cops, state troopers or county sheriff's deputies -- definitely have technology on their side.

At this point in the history of highway driving, everyone knows that the most popular police speed traps employ good old-fashioned radar. In this scenario, of course, a police officer will stealthily park his or her police car out of the view of oncoming motorists, perhaps under an overpass, in a ditch in the middle of the freeway or behind a billboard.

Then, the police officer will flip on a radar unit that transmits radio waves at particular frequencies. The waves bounce off the target, in this case, a car that the police officer thinks is speeding, and those waves are then picked up by a receiver. The shift in frequencies tells the police officer how fast the car is going.

In recent years, however, more and more police departments have been using laser guns, either in addition to or instead of radar. "We began using the laser guns about 10 years ago," says one former police officer from a midwestern state, who asked that we not use his real name. We'll call him Jack.

"They're actually more efficient than radar. The laser guns can pinpoint a specific car much more accurately," says Jack. The other advantage to using a laser gun is that the laser light can't be detected by those pricey radar detectors often used by drivers who would really rather speed with impunity -- or is that immunity?

One of the more sly methods that police officers use to detect hot-footing motorists is aerial detection. Typically, this is done by painting white lines at either end of a stretch of highway

-- usually a quarter-mile or half-mile long. A police officer in a helicopter or plane will time how long it takes the driver to travel the distance between the lines. "That allows the spotter to calculate the driver's speed," says Jack. "He can then just call ahead to an officer in a patrol car on the ground that's another two or three miles down the highway, and tell him, 'green Taurus, left lane.'"

In another aerial speed-detection technique, the police officer simply does a visual estimate of the speed of the cars below, and compares it to the "ground speed" of the helicopter based on using visual targets along the highway.

There is yet another method to catch speeders, and it doesn't require a police officer to be physically present at the speed trap location. Speed cameras are attached to lampposts or telephone poles and are programmed to snap photos of speeding vehicles. While speed cameras have been employed on a comparatively limited basis in the United States, they've been used more extensively in Europe, Canada and other parts of the world for more than 30 years, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

This method can deliver a delayed shock to the system of a speeder, since the driver isn't pulled over on the spot. He won't know that he's gotten a speeding ticket until he receives the eye-popping infraction notice in the mail. If you have a problem controlling your tongue in the presence of a police officer who has just written you a $200 speeding ticket, this ticketing system might be your favorite.

Sometimes, the best enforcement of speed limits is a not-so-subtle reminder in the form of the electronic speed boards you see alongside a highway that flash big, bright, white-hot numbers in your face to let you know how fast you're going. These boards also employ radar.

"The radar unit sees the target, transmits the radio waves, they bounce back, and tell the drivers how fast they're going," says Jack. "We used to think of those speed boards as being more of an 'awareness program,' because they reminded people how fast they were going. A lot of drivers really don't know how fast they're going, so these speed boards essentially are a means of urging voluntary compliance."

And, according to Jack, that's the main point of enforcing speed limits via speed traps. While traffic fines do augment revenues for the city, state or country, that's not why speed traps are set up, says Jack. "That's a myth that we had quotas on how many traffic tickets we had to write in a single month. We just want people to obey the speed limit, because it's for their own safety," says Jack. "The main reason for setting up a speed trap, whether it's radar, laser or aerial monitoring, is simply to encourage voluntary compliance of the law," says Jack.

"And we never cared if someone called in a radio station and says, 'Oh, there's a speed trap set up on such-and-such a road,' because it achieved the same result as a motorist seeing a cop writing someone a ticket. It got people to slow down."

(Ed. Note: Based on reader reaction to the statement about quotas we consulted a second police officer, a highway patrolman in the southwest, and he offered the same answer, "We didn't have quotas, either." said Carl, whose name was changed for reasons of anonymity. "In my experience, speeding-citation revenues were not a great portion of municipal revenue. Speed enforcement is for the benefit of the public -- to reduce the number of accidents, especially fatal accidents. Unfortunately, drivers think they know best what they should be able to do, and choose convenience over caution." It is possible quotas are enforced in some states or districts and not in others, like Jack's or Carl's.)

Read More Stories at AOL Autos:

- 10 Classic American Rides

- Best Car Commercials

- What's in the White House Garage?

1 - 10 of 285
285 comments
twelvlegions 1:13 AM Jul 03, 2009 Report This!
By using police presence and speeding citations the government definitely has a measure of public safety in mind. However, the number of tickets handed out, and many times the manner in, or ************* under which they are handed out prove they play a part in revenue creation. For anyone who has appealed a traffic citation without strong evidence to their innocence, they know their only hope to getting completely off is that an officer representing the citing police department doesn't show for the clerk magistrate's hearing, or the citing officer himself doesn't show for the judge's appeal. This is because the court only gives a "not responsible" finding in rare cases and for good reason. If someone is found "not responsible" the state gets no money for their time. Have you ever noticed that the court is ALWAYS willing to reduce the fine if you just show up to the appeal? You don't even have to admit responsibility. (Regardless, thats what you'll be found anyway) You're there to fight the citation, to appeal. Essentially when you sign the back of the citation and send it in, you are denying responsibility for whatever is on the ticket. Then you go on the day of your hearing and give them a million excuses, but just for showing up, they reduce the fine. They won't in a million years take it away but they'll reduce ******** an absurd face value on the citation so they reduce it to what they call the "minimum fine required by state law". So even though you are there to fight it, they will actually reduce it. They make the initial fine ridiculously high and then lower it, clearly just trying to get the minimum fine from everyone. If that's not about the money, I don't know what is. If they weren't trying to bring in a certain revenue and instead it was ONLY about making the public safe, they'd hit the drivers so hard in the wallet (pay full ticket face value), they couldn't afford to speed, like they do with the multiple DUI offenders. The thing that kills me is the court actually punishes you if wish to exercise your right to appeal the clerk magistrate's finding. For example, anytime you go to your initial hearing and they find you "responsible" but reduce the fine, if you wish to appeal the "responsible" finding to a judge, the reduced fine is automatically put back at the face value of the citation. It's like they're trying to bribe you to accept the finding to save them time and court costs. They don't care though because either way they're getting money out of you. So then you go before the judge and he listens to you rattle off your story and you're found responsible and have to pay the full amount of the citation. However, you can go in and be apologetic and actually get the citation reduced again by the judge even though you challenged the magistrates finding. Huh? They're happy if they get you to submit yourself to their authority, but either way they're getting money out of you.
dutchess6758 8:51 PM Jul 02, 2009 Report This!
why is it women and cell phones???? i know plenty men who cant talk and drive at the same time... men use their cell phones as much as women do... they are usually talking to the women... so stop puttin us into one section.. everyone needs to be more careful when talking on their phones
thaaahfliiipboy 6:57 AM Jun 30, 2009 Report This!
****** DUMBASS I DARE YOU TO SAY I U HATE COPS CUZZ MY UNCLE WILL **** RADE YOUR ASS AND MY DAD THERR BOTH NICE COOL COPS NOT ALL COPS I MEAN MANN
xxmichelle412xx 6:16 PM Jun 29, 2009 Report This!
to godeep...what does women on cell phones have to do with speeding? usually if you see a person on a cell phone they tend to be going slower, not faster and there are just as many men out there being just as idiotic. I think the concept of a speed limit is ridiculous. I have seen accidents caused because of speed limits - like whne there is a cop everyone on the highway will slam on their brakes. I think speed limits shoudl be abolished and the criteria for getting a license should be more strict and more difficlut to fit. Also, cops in my experience have always been jerks, leading to my dislike for them, though there are that select few good ones out there i think it is completely understandable to hate cops because many of them are rotten to the core.
nacreserut 5:57 PM Jun 29, 2009 Report This!
Yeah to the people who say its for money So they pay police officers salaries whose sole purpose is to wait around for a speeder. These officers are given expensive equipment like radar guns or lasers. Oh and don't forget helicopters because those are certainly cheap, especially with the amount of gas they burn per hour which can range from 12 to 120 gallons per hour depending on what model it is. Oh and don't forget the planes because they come cheap. Use your head, they would always be wasting more money than they are earning, they might have quotas ******* not for the money. I know you people think its so cool to hate cops and "fight the power" and the fuzz, but really they have a job, they have orders, and they are doing it. Stop bashing them, they are not telling you how to do your job are they?
irwcat 5:41 PM Jun 29, 2009 Report This!
I think ********* not a "quota" system. I think ********* a "Oh, you're not pulling anyone over? That means we don't need you anymore! Please pack your things and look for another job." According to the two police officers, they pull people over in attempt to get them to slow down and be safe. So what happens if everyone goes the speed limit? We don't need police officers anymore, and they lose their job. The officers don't have quotas to fulfill so much as they have to allow themselves job security. ...but that creates a new thought. Police Officers are doing their job so that they can keep their job and have an income more or less. Just like tax auditors, insurance agents, the guy who hands you your bill of debts. If anything, consider the Police Officer pulling you over not because it has a quota, but because it has to make a living, and it just so happens to be by writing you a ticket for speeding, which is, according to paperwork, against the law anyways.
rhpohio 5:36 PM Jun 29, 2009 Report This!
Speeding tickets and speed traps are about REVENUE ENHANCEMENT, not public safety. To even insinuate the latter is one of the biggest LIES the government tells us. Safety isn't about speed per se. It's about the appropriate speed for what you're doing and the conditions you're in. I've seen just as many accidents caused by people driving too SLOW or driving like idiots than by people who were merely driving too fast.
jason22683 5:33 PM Jun 29, 2009 Report This!
Why are so many cursing the police? No one is making you speed. They're (the police) there to control traffic to prevent the possibility of an EMT scraping someone off the street later. If you control your speed, chances are you won't get pulled over, and have such a negative look at officers.
mrmitb1018 5:31 PM Jun 29, 2009 Report This!
there are less accidents on the autobahns in europe than on the interstate in the US. explain that one
godeep10182 5:28 PM Jun 29, 2009 Report This!
A-holes who cant drive at or near the speed limit or park correctly suck, Leet. The speed traps are the only thing keeping retarded teenagers and women on cell phones from making the roads even more dangerous.
1 - 10 of 285
285 comments
car.com
blackbook

research a new car

find used cars for sale near you

Avoid getting a lemon for your next used car.
Start with a Free CARFAX Record Check.

Powered by Get a free CARFAX record check for a used car
ABUSE REPORT

From:

Your Comment:
Send Report Cancel