2008 Top Safety Picks from IIHS

By REX ROY, AOL AUTOS

Toyota Tundra

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) awarded thirty-four 2008 model vehicles the Top Safety Pick rating, more than double the number of vehicles that earned the rating in 2007. Eligible vehicles traditionally included all cars, minivans and small or midsize SUVs, while this year, small and large pickups were also eligible to earn the IIHS's top rating.

To pick the winners, the IIHS evaluates the each vehicle's combined performance of three individual crash tests. For 2008, Ford Motor Company stands out as the manufacturer with the most vehicles on the list with eight winners, helped by the performance of its Volvo models. Honda, including vehicles from its luxury division Acura, produced seven top picks.

2008 Top Safety Picks from IIHS
Large Cars	Audi A6, Ford Taurus, Mercury Sable & Volvo S80
Midsize Cars	Audi A3, Audi A4, Honda Accord, Saab 9-3 & Subaru Legacy*
Midsize Convertibles	Saab 9-3 & Volvo C70
Small Car	Subaru Impreza*
Minivans	Honda Odyssey, Hyundai Entourage & Kia Sedona
Midsize SUVs	Acura MDX, Acura RDX, BMW X3, BMW X5, Ford Edge, Ford Taurus X, Honda Pilot, Hyundai Santa Fe, Hyundai Veracruz, Lincoln MKX, Mercedes M-Class, Saturn VUE, Subaru Tribeca, Toyota Highlander & Volvo XC90
Small SUVs	Honda CR-V, Honda Element & Subaru Forester*
Large Pickup	Toyota Tundra
With optional electronic stability control, *Built after August 2007

Understanding the Tests
To best understand the severe nature of the IIHS tests, here's a quick summary of what vehicles are put through. Frontal crash tests ram the vehicle into an offset barrier at 40 mph. The impact simulates two vehicles hitting head-on, similar to what might happen on a two-lane road. Experts evaluate the results based on "injuries" sustained by the crash dummies sitting inside the vehicle. Reviewing slow motion film of the crash allows them to further assess the performance of the restraint system.

Side-impact tests involve a stationary vehicle that is hit by a moving barrier traveling at 31 mph. This test simulates the damage similar to being rammed by a large SUV or pickup truck. Results are once again evaluated based on injury to the dummies along with effectiveness of the side airbags and the movement of the B-pillar, the vertical column right behind the front seat, into the passenger compartment.

The rear crash test is the most recent addition to the program. Vehicles are first categorized based on quality of head protection based on seat and restraint design. If a satisfactory rating is received in this first review, a rear impact test is performed. This test specifies that a stationary vehicle is hit from behind with a barrier moving at 20 mph. Then head and neck strain on the dummy are measured to determine the results of the test.

Ford Taurus

Electronics Play a Part in Safety
While the three crash tests give researchers insight into the performance of a vehicle during a crash, the recent widespread availability of Electronic Stability Control (ESC) systems helps prevent many accidents from happening in the first place. "Vehicles should be designed to provide good occupant protection when crashes occur, but now with ESC, we have the possibility of preventing many crashes altogether," says Adrian Lund, IIHS president.

Automakers have many different names for their ESC systems, but the systems take the concept of anti-lock brakes to the next level with overall vehicle stability enhancement. These complex systems are able to help a driver maintain control with precision application of the brakes and sophisticated traction control electronics. ESC systems can sense a spin or skid happening, and can intervene to prevent this potentially dangerous happening.

For a vehicle to qualify as a Top Pick, the IIHS requires that the vehicle must be available with ESC.

Vehicles Are Getting Safer
It used to be that only the most expensive vehicles had advanced safety equipment. Perception might also cause one to think that larger vehicles are safer. This is clearly not the case in 2008. The IIHS list names winners from affordable mainstream brands, with vehicles as compact as the Audi A3 and Saab 9-3.

Seeing the progress from year to year is encouraging. Looking at historical IIHS data, front crash ratings show the highest performance results. It is generally the side and rear tests that cause models to suffer. Recently, however, due to the improving design of side-curtain airbags, side crash ratings have significantly improved.

The rear impact tests uncover an area with room for improvement, and this 2004 addition to the testing program is inspiring changes for the better in many vehicles. For example, redesigned seat/head restraints in the Honda Accord, Element and Odyssey along with the BMW X3 and X5 have now earned a "good" rating, which is a huge jump from the previous "poor" or "marginal" ratings. The importance of such changes is amplified with the awareness that an additional 23 vehicles would have earned an award in 2008 had it been for a modification in their seat/head restraints.

ALSO RANS

Twenty-three vehicles earn good ratings in front and side crash tests. They have ESC, standard or optional. They would be 2008 Top Safety Pick winners if their seat/head restraints also earned good ratings:

Acura RL & TL

BMW 3-Series

Chrysler Sebring Convertible

Infiniti M35 & M45

Kia Amanti

Lexus IS 250 & 350, ES 350, GS 350 & 460

Nissan Pathfinder & Xterra (both with optional side airbags)

Nissan Quest

Toyota Avalon, Camry, FJ Cruiser, 4Runner, Prius, RAV4, & Sienna

Volkswagen Eos, Jetta, Passat, Rabbit

What These Tests Mean
The IIHS tests make it easy to evaluate the relative safety performance of various models. By visiting IIHS online, it's easy to see how your favorite new car, truck or SUV did in the IIHS testing.

What impressed us most about these results is the fact that high-performance safety is no longer something offered only by expensive European names. Ford's affordable Taurus and Sable, along with their new crossovers (Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX) are top picks. High-volume models from Subaru, Saturn, and Kia also made the list. With today's technology, safety can be something any new car buyer can afford.

About the author: Rex Roy is a Detroit-based automotive writer and journalist. His new book, Motor City Dream Garages, will be on shelves in November.

Must Read?

94 %

6 %

123 VOTES

Recent Comments

Post Your Own

1 - 10 of 272

272 comments

JBofmm 10:29:17 AM Jun 23 2008

Report This!

Jet202, you're selling your country, your neighbors, and your loved ones short. You're less than half right in your comments. You'll be singing a different tune when Japan owns this whole country.

Erik in FL 09:18:15 AM Jun 22 2008

Report This!

hey ohhonda98,
Just wanted to correct a few mistakes you made:
1. Brand with the most owner loyalty...... Jeep
2. When Mercedes bought Chrsler, Chrysler was the most profitable car company in the world. The European Mercedes company ran Chrysler into the ground! They realized they didn't know how to run an American car company, and cut their losses.
3. Resale value.... 2 reasons why jap cars have better resale value....
a. Rentals..... American cars are sold to hertz, Enterprise, Etc in the tens of thousands, and are sold at auction 1 year later in the tens of thousands.. so if you are a dealer and want to buy 2 minivans for your lot at the auction, 1 toyota and 1 dodge, you will have 900 dodges run through the auction, and 3 toyotas.... It is called SUPPLY and DEMAD.
b. Rebates.... right now, any dealer will give you 10 grand off a ram truck or a F-150, so big supprise the are worth 1/2 of MSRP 1 year later..... you can get 1/3 off when you buy it! If you l

MFDPA 09:28:50 PM Jun 20 2008

Report This!

The problem with the new IIHS rating is that they mix two different measures. The front and side measures refer to reducing risk of significant injury like broken bones or head injury whereas the rear "crash test" refers to whiplash (i.e. a sore neck). If you compare the Taurus to the Passat or the Camry the side and front impact numbers and structural integrity favor the Passat or Camry.

Personally I rather reduce my risk of broken bones and head trauma over a sore neck.

I am not sure why the change but I suspect it has to do with lower payouts by the insurance industry if there is less whiplash vs less injury and death from better front and side numbers. After all the are the INSURANCE institute for highway safety

Hscoe3rd 03:55:14 PM Jun 16 2008

Report This!

I love to read the opinions that are never based on fact stating the imports are 'better' vehicles than the domestic vehicles. I left an import dealership (not 100% imports) to sell for a domestic auto maker because the safety, reliability and technology has already surpassed the so called imports. Working for two different imports, service was our largest profit center, not sales. Even one of the preminenty imports was finally forced by the government to stop calling recalls "service advisories" and call them what they actually are: "RECALLS". Look more closely at the domestics for what they have to offer and lose the mind set of "imports must be better because Consumer Reports and Edmonds" say so. Also keep in mind that neither Consumer Reports, Edmonds or Kelly Blue Book buy and/or sell vehicles.

Dankandel 10:34:42 AM Jun 15 2008

Report This!

HEY WAXIEE2,

THE PROBLEM WITH AMERICAN MADE CARS IS THE QUALITY AND RELIABILITY. ALTHOUGH GM AND FORD HAVE MADE IMPROVEMENTS, THEY STILL LAG BEHIND THE IMPORTS.

FOR ME, THE GERMAN CARS HAVE THEIR ACT TOGETHER.......ESPECIALLY AUDI