A A A
    by: Kevin Ransom | AOL Autos
     

    Distracted driving remains a huge problem in America, despite various cell phone laws banning texting and talking while driving. In fact, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood convened a national summit on the issue in late September, the second such event in as many years. But thus far, it remains a problem without a consistent, reliable solution, according to two recent reports.

    Indeed, a report issued on Sept. 28 by the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) found that that laws banning texting while driving did not result in fewer car crashes. HLDI is part of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Further, the HLDI reported that, after the bans went into effect, there was actually a slight increase in the frequency of insurance claims filed under collision coverage for damage to vehicles in crashes. The finding was based on the number of such claims filed in four states (California, Minnesota, Washington and Louisiana) before and after their texting bans -- compared with patterns of claims in nearby states.

    Similar findings were recently reported in a study conducted by the AAA of Southern California.

    Legislation Ineffective

    The fact that crashes actually increased slightly after texting bans went into effect prompted Adrian Lund, president of IIHS, to observe that “there is no way to know if the primary cause of distracted driving is texting and talking on cell phones. So, if the bans are not reducing crashes, then we probably shouldn’t just be focusing on texting and cell phones, because the problem seems to be bigger than that.

    “We had distracted driving before there were cell phones,” notes Lund, pointing to long-standing careless and even reckless driving habits like shaving, eating, applying eye make-up and fiddling with stereos while driving.

    Lund also theorizes that, in some cases, the texting ban may have actually led to an increase in crashes. “If a ban is in place and a driver is texting and sees a police car, he may drop the phone into his lap to hide it, which takes his eyes off the road even more than if he was holding it up and texting,” says Lund.

    AOL Autos Poll
    Do you think laws against texting and talking while driving really work?

    Enforcement of the ban also probably has not been vigorous or visible enough, says Lund, but he doesn’t blame the police for that. “In California, thousands of tickets have been written to drivers for using hand-held cell phones while driving, but there have been far fewer tickets handed out for texting, because it is harder to detect.”

    Plus, devoting manpower to specifically enforcing the texting-while-driving ban is an expensive proposition for law enforcement agencies right now, considering that so many cities, counties and states have slashed budgets as a result of the recession.

    Stepping Up Enforcement

    However, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has initiated two “demonstration programs,” in Hartford, Connecticut, and Syracuse, New York, to test whether or not “high visibility enforcement” could reduce texting and the use of hand-held cell phones while driving. Under the program, the cities are specifically dedicating officers to enforcing the bans, and also conducting media campaigns to publicize that ramped-up enforcement.

    The program is being conducted in four “waves,” the first two of which were between March and August. The third wave is happening now. The fourth wave will be conducted in early 2011. During the first two waves, the use of hand-held cell-phone use while driving dropped 56 percent in Hartford and 38 percent in Syracuse, while texting while driving dropped 68 percent in Harvard and 42 percent in Syracuse, according to a NHTSA report.

    “The programs were very successful,” noted Lund. “Of course, that costs money, so the question is, ‘How do we get all of the cities to implement that level of enforcement with so many municipalities being strapped for cash?’”

    In the meantime, Lund points to the increased development of onboard technologies that he hopes will cut down on the number of crashes that result from distracted driving – “like the crash-avoidance systems, lane-departure warnings and blind-spot warning systems that are becoming more and more commonplace in current vehicles.”

    There are also carmakers who have built hands-free cell-phone applications into their vehicles, like the Sync system in various Ford vehicles.

    More Technology

    ZoomSafer, a Virginia-based provider of smart-phone software has developed another technological solution to clamp down on texting. Its software can be used to lock down the keypads and screens of smart pones, and suppress all “alerts” emitting from the phones, eliminating the temptation to text or send e-mails while driving. It also responds to incoming messages with an outgoing message that tells callers that the recipient is driving, and will call them back when no longer behind the wheel.

    “This behavior -- texting while driving -- definitely appears to be betting worse, but it’s hard right now for anyone to get their arms around how much it contributes to distracted driving, and, in turn, to crashes and injuries and fatalities,” says Matt Howard, ZoomSafer CEO, who was on one of the panels at the aforementioned September summit.

    “But, the way I see it, people are only motivated to change their behavior through fear, or greed,” stresses Howard.

    Howard got the idea for the software and started his company in 2008, after he nearly killed a nine-year-old boy when he was distracted by an e-mail on his mobile phone.

    “If you’re not afraid of paying the ticket, or the points on your driving record, which leads to higher insurance premiums, you’re not likely to be deterred from engaging in this careless driving behavior. If you don’t have the economic incentive, the motivation to change is low.

    Playing To The Lawyers

    At present, ZoomSafer’s primary markets are companies who provide their employees with company-issued cell phones and company cars.

    “In that situation, if you’re behind the wheel, and you get into an accident and injure someone while texting, the plaintiff’s attorney will sue your company,” says Howard. “So if individuals do not currently feel motivated by texting bans and enforcement, and are not fearful of paying a fine, well, companies are definitely motivated to reduce their legal liability.

    Howard says the texting-while-driving problem is especially vexing because it reveals “this perverted need that so many people have to stay hyper-connected, a need that seems to be stronger than the knowledge that and texting while driving could end up costing them their lives.

    “They know it’s distracting, they know it’s dangerous, but it’s really just a new spin on that old attitude, the one where people tell themselves, ‘It can’t happen to me.’”

    Quick Shopping Tools:

    Research New Cars

    Cars for Sale in Your Area

    Get Repair Estimates

     
    Discuss
    1 - 20 of 27 Comments
    littlerosefield Jan 23, 2011 2:52 AM
    why do so may people think its ok to use thier cell in the car if they have it on speaker phone .It's still in your hand and you'er still ************ your driving.Please wait tel you stop to call your loved one so we both make it home.
    Report This
    foosfev Dec 06, 2010 2:22 AM
    PLEASE READ AND PONDER, I pulled into our neighborhood gas station and as I got out of my car, a sports car of some type pulled in followed by a big suv that pulled in behind her slammed on her brakes, jumped out, ran up to the blonde in the sports car, opened the door ,grabbed the blonde teens phone out of her hand and smashed on the ground yelling watch the dam road not your phone you idiot, I have children I want to see graduate!!!!, we all cheered the mother on. she left with hands in the air--WHEN! When are they going to outlaw texting to this stupid little bimbos who can text but have no BRAINS about driving??
    Report This
    bcd2222 Oct 24, 2010 8:08 PM
    NEW CELL TECH.WILL NOT ALLOW RECEPTION OF WITHIN 10 FT.OF AN INTERNAL COMBUSTIAN-ENGINE.To transmit or receive,kill the engine...........bcd
    Report This
    rayrmelc Oct 24, 2010 5:47 PM
    In think we need to mind our own business unless the person screws up.
    Report This
    themodernage1881 Oct 24, 2010 2:12 AM
    You guys have some retarded solutions to the problem. I think I'll be the first guy to studio linguistics and program an effective and reliable voice-to-text technology.
    Report This
    ladkraemer Oct 23, 2010 2:31 PM
    Actually they shouldn't pass laws to make us wear seat belt or not text, etc. What we should do is let the insurance companies enforce there right not to cover you if you violate your contract with them. In all insurance company contracts it states that you can not put the em in financial harms way... that's how they handled it in Germany. Everyone immediately started wearing their seat belts there. Or if you are caught texting you receive the same penalty as a drunk driver....1st offence you lose your licence for 2 years, impound the car, go to jail and the reason it should be even worse than a DUI, you are fully conscious of what you are doing. A drunk might not know what he is doing.
    Report This
    ladkraemer Oct 23, 2010 2:19 PM
    I'm in the auto business and I think all cars should have blue tooth in them... there are still models out there with out blue tooth... and those who say what about the passengers, well they can receive calls and make them while in the car.... but texting, Oh well I guess we have to make sacrifices to save lives.
    Report This
    ladkraemer Oct 23, 2010 2:13 PM
    we need to make the phones so that texting and receiving text won't work until the car comes to a full stop... and then has a 3 min. delay.
    Report This
    dmande6304 Oct 22, 2010 9:19 PM
    I've devised a jamming device, when the key is inserted into the ignition it jams cell phone signals
    Report This
    ojbutski Oct 22, 2010 4:23 PM
    First of all for all of those saying to make a law or a device that blocks phones from working in cars while the car is in motion. That will NEVER happen. What about the passenger who is sitting there talking while the driver is driving ? What law is he breaking ? NONE !! What about passengers in the back seat who may be talking on the phone ? Again NO laws being broken. Not to mention any one of these people could be a specialist doctor on the way to a hospital trying to save your mom or dad or family member from dying talking to a nurse or another doctor while on the way there. See the point. The law has to be fair and work for everyone. Cell phone companies will NEVER stop towers from working as thats interrupting service. Forget about the thousands of dollars they would lose each year replacing that cost back to the cellphone owner. The lawsuits alone would kill that program. Then theres the cops and lawyers and political candidates who use cell phones while driving. You cant punish everyone for those who break the law. One reasonable law should be as it was mentioned above. In order to deter those who get caught while texting or driving you remove their driving priviledges (suspend) for a month AND you confiscate their cell phone away as well. Thats a first offense. A 2nd offense is suspend their license for 6 months with a $1000 fine. This will definitely stop them from doing it again. If they are not smart to stop by then a 3rd offense can be to take away their license permanently and also their right to get a cell phone in their name with ANY cell phone company on the market.
    The laws will be broken yes. But after the first slap on the wrist would you risk it again ? The harsher the penalty the more the one breaking the law will think twice about breaking it. But to be fair these laws have to be held for everyone. Not just regular citizens who drive everyday. But for ALL including lawyers, cops, judges, political appointees and such. Only those with a valid (doctor saving a life only emergency) should get a pass.
    Report This
    fathertimema Oct 22, 2010 2:28 PM
    These law makers need to learn laws means nothing. Just like restraining orders are usles pieces of paper. Only way to stop texting when driving is to design cell phones NOT to be able to text or display a text when the car or cell phone is moving. A very easy was to stop the texting while driving problem. ******* a great idea law makers are trying to solve this problem
    Report This
    lmsale123 Oct 22, 2010 1:11 PM
    The way to stop cell phone while driving is to notify their insurance company this way the drivers insurance could be raised double for the first offense and double that on any following offenses. If there is an accident invoiced then the phone carrier (Verizon, Sprint, ETC) should be sued also.
    Report This
    monoblocks05 Oct 22, 2010 1:01 PM
    I still see people on their phones after the ban in my state went into effect. But the number of these illegal cell phone users seems to be down. Before it seemed as if every other driver had a phone in their hands. Now it's only the occasional violator flagrantly and openly flouting their handheld device. Most everyone else appear to be using some sort of Bluetooth device. I'd guess that the driving texters are trying to be more covert and inconspicuous with their addiction while in the car, and that may be why the accident rate is up...their attention is even MORE diverted and distracted from what they're supposed to be looking at. This is assuming that there really IS a relationship between cell phone/texting and the spike in insurance claims after the bans went into effect.
    Report This
    luvtojaz Oct 22, 2010 12:33 PM
    take their licence
    Report This
    luvtojaz Oct 22, 2010 12:32 PM
    Shoot them all..
    Report This
    nepnad Oct 22, 2010 10:17 AM
    Fear or greed... Let me see... OK, make laws with VERY STIFF penalties for all of these Ignoramous, inconsiderate,idiotic BONEHEADS who find the need to text worthless nonsense to each other while trying to drive. Most of these people are lousy drivers without the cellphone in their hands. This is DANGEROUS behavior, People... Please use your heads(those of you who know how that is...) Save the texting for when you are in park in a safe location!! Hang UP and Drive!!!
    Report This
    jeffyeye6 Oct 21, 2010 2:36 AM
    I Think That If You Get Cought The Ferist Time It Should Be $500.00. The Secound Time 1,000.00 Fine And 3 Mouth Driver Lic Supenchen. The Therd Time 3,000.00 One Yrs Driver Lic Supenchon And Comuity Servise Because No One Is Looking At Nuthing, Even The Cops Are On There Cell Phones And Thats Not Far... The Cop Will Pull Some One Over But There Talking On The Phone Too. That Should Be Fixed ASAP... The Only Way To Talk On The Cell Phone Is To Pull Over And Talk But Not Doing It Wale Driveing
    Report This
    beaubuick Oct 20, 2010 10:35 PM
    THERE SHOULD BE SOME TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY TO SHUT YOUR RECEPTION OFF WHILE IN A CAR/TRUCK ECT, WHILE IT IS RUNNING OR MOVING.. T H E S E N U T S ARE H O R R I B L E !!!!!!!
    Report This
    msmailbox Oct 20, 2010 10:05 PM
    Ironically, I become distracted by the act of looking into people's cars to see if they are using a cell phone. I never used to do this, but now I am obessessed by watching for cell phones, or texters. Lately, I've been concentrating upon my own driving and I feel safer then when I was trolling for dialers.
    Report This
    cbeetom Oct 20, 2010 8:47 PM
    THE FINES ARE NOT STIFF ENOUGH. SHOULD BE FOR THE FIRST OFFENSE, $500.00. SECOND OFFENSE, $1,000. THIRD OFFENSE, $5,000 AND THE CAR IS IMPOUNDED FOR THIRTY DAYS. AFTER THAT DRIVING PRIVILEGES SUSPENDED FOR A YEAR AND A $10,000 FINE.. MAYBE THAN THE REST WILL TAKE THE HINT.
    Report This
    1 - 20 of 27 Comments
     
    Leave A Comment?
    Please keep your comments relevant to the Cell Phone Laws Are Not Working article.
    AOL Autos looks at why cell phone laws against distracted driving are not working.
    ABUSE REPORT

    From:

    Your Comment:
    Send Report Cancel